I have come across some hard facts about why some of the protocols behave the way they do and I want to use this “Do you know ………..” to be tracking all these. This is more like a Question & Answer (Q & A). As I come across them I will be adding them to this list. As time goes on, I expect this list to be long.
Please note that comments, corrections, further explanations are welcome on this thread……..
Here we go………..
Question: Why is it a requirement in OSPF to have all other areas be either physically connected to area 0 or through virtual link or tunnells ?
What I found out about this is the fact that when you observe the behaviour of ospf ABR routers, you realised that what ABR does basically is to summarise reachbale networks within area and then generate LSA Type 3 (Summary LSA) and have this advertised to other areas.
If we reduce OSPF domain within an autonomous system to just the ABRs and their corresponding links, you will see that interchange of LSA Type 3 is done hop by hop (this is basically what happens between any area and area 0).
Hence, to ensure every ospf area has full reachability information from all othe areas, it is a requirement that every area be connected to area 0. With this area 0 has a full reachability detail and it exchanges them with all other areas within the domain.
This is kinda looks like holding daily management meetings everyday in an organisation and every department manager is required to attend and share whatever information they need to share so that every other manager in the meeting can hear it and subsequently share it with their respective teams.
Question: One-way PPP Link Aunthentication
I came across an interesting topic (that I never knew before) that ppp aunthentication does not really have to be configured on both ends of the link for it to work.
I know that for the CCIE lab, PPP encap will probably expect basically 2 types of aunthentication – CHAP & PAP. To enable this chap aunthetication type, we normally need a configuration similar to the one shown below;
- hostname R1
username R3 password 0 cisco
interface Serial1/1
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation ppp
ppp authentication chap
- hostname R3
username R1 password 0 cisco
interface Serial1/1
ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0
encapsulation ppp - ppp authentication chap
But the truth is that we really do not need to have ppp authentication chap enabled on both ends for this link to be authenticated prior to moving it to UP state. All that is required is to have it enabled on one end of the link as shown below.
- hostname R1
username R3 password 0 cisco
interface Serial1/1
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation ppp
ppp authentication chap
- hostname R3
username R1 password 0 cisco
interface Serial1/1
ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0
encapsulation ppp
Now the interesting part to this is that what if we get a question that says make R1 authenticate R3 with chap while on this same link, R3 authenticates R1 with pap ?
For this, all we need to do is to enable ppp authentication pap on R3 and ensure we configure ppp pap sent-usename <name> password <pass> on the R1 end under the interface config. This required because with pap, router do not sent it’s hostname with the shared password, hence this has to be configured on the remote end.
- hostname R1
username R3 password 0 cisco
interface Serial1/1
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation ppp
ppp authentication chap - ppp pap pap sent-username R1 password cisco
- hostname R3
username R1 password 0 cisco
interface Serial1/1
ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0
encapsulation ppp - ppp authentication pap
Question: Running multicast in hub/spoke network (Frame Relay).
One important thing not to forget is to enable ip pim nbma-mode on the hub router.
Filed under: CCIE lab Preps, PPP | Leave a Comment »
Changing Blog site theme
Wondering if you were still in the same blog site or a different one !!
This is still the Sesano’s CCIE Blog site!
I have just changed the blog site theme as I wish to have 2 column rather than a single column that I had with previous theme.
Filed under: General Comments | Leave a Comment »